I love discussions on time travel, ’cause there are so many avenues one can take when it comes to paradox analysis, not to mention the philosophical meanderings one can produce on the subject. However, time travel as a function of movement is not something I had a clear conceptualization on, and this, of course, is how time travel is said, by the scientific community, to actually exist. Enter an article at Scientific American which lays down some of the theories behind time travel in near-layman terms. If you like sci-fi, or wet your pants when it comes to physics, give this article a look.
Similar Posts:
- No, it’s not another Kubrick film. – Scientific American posted a story concerning autonomous systems and what the next step for servers …
- Apple TV disappoints. Again. – When Apple TV first hit shelves, I had a couple things to say, the gist of which involved the device…
- A different kind of MMORPG. – EVE Online has been around since 2003, and most people don’t know about it. Part of that likely has …
- A convenient story. – The tale of global warming is a complicated one, and apparently an issue that has divided not only t…
- Bring AppStore-banned apps to Cydia/Installer.app! – Per Nullriver’s own statement, Apple’s final judgement on NetShare is simple: perma-banned from the …
