iPhones are not being bricked.

by WyldKard on September 28, 2007

It wasn’t that long ago that real “tech words” never entered Average Joe’s vernacular. These days, the dumb media, and in turn, Average Joe himself, misuses geek terminology like they’re reinventing a word from scratch. Case in point: the recent -upgrades--firmware fiasco, in which thousands of stupid users hacked their phones and didn’t think twice about installing ’s upgrade before real hackers tested the upgrade to see what negative effects it could have. It’s not as though people weren’t warned: every major blog who reported on the unlocking scene proposed that owners of unlocked iPhones steer clear of future “upgrades” until it’s been verified that these upgrades either (A) don’t re-lock the , or (B) allow the to be re-unlocked afterwards.

Either way, the stupidity continues when reports are all over the webscape that ’s 1.1.1 firmware is bricking iPhones, when it’s not. The firmware upgrade is re-locking previously-hacked iPhones, requiring them to be reactivated with AT&T. This is not the same thing as “bricking.” From NinjaWords:

brick (v) : to make an electronic device nonfunctional, rendering it as useful as a brick

This is not a complicated concept. Hacked iPhones upgraded with firmware 1.1.1 are still functioning – they turn on, can be reset by the occasionally-helpful Store employee, and most of them can still be activated with the original AT&T sim card that came with the phone immediately after the firmware upgrade is done. Thus, these iPhones are not equivalent to expensive paperweights (i.e. they’re not bricked).

Similar Posts:

Leave a Comment