<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mendax.org &#187; theorycraft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mendax.org/tag/theorycraft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mendax.org</link>
	<description>WyldKard&#039;s mental brouhaha. est. 1996</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:40:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hunter blogs: welcome to 2004.</title>
		<link>http://mendax.org/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Posts+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fmendax.org%2F2007%2F12%2F25%2Fhunter-blogs-welcome-to-2004%2F&amp;seed_title=Hunter+blogs%3A+welcome+to+2004.</link>
		<comments>http://mendax.org/2007/12/25/hunter-blogs-welcome-to-2004/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 20:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WyldKard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Techno-Shaman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theorycraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warcraft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mendax.org/?p=629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few days ago, Xizang became another World of Warcraft (WoW) blogger to point out the proliferation of WordPress-based blogs in the WoW blogosphere. This trend has has been the village gossip for a couple weeks, but to us older bloggers, the emigration from Blogger is pure common sense: serious bloggers are going to use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>A few days ago, Xizang became another World of <a href="http://mendax.org/tag/warcraft/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with warcraft">Warcraft</a> (WoW) blogger to point out <a href="http://xi-perience.blogspot.com/2007/12/blogger-board-domain-madness.html" class="broken_link">the proliferation</a> of WordPress-based blogs in the WoW blogosphere. This trend has has been the village gossip for a couple weeks, but to us older bloggers, the emigration from Blogger is pure common sense: serious bloggers are going to use a platform that&#8217;s customizable, more robust, and independent.</p>
<p>Unlike the aforementioned, <i>correct</i> evolution, however, we&#8217;re also seeing a number of WoW blogs adding their own fora, which is an all-around bad idea, and one that I don&#8217;t wish to see continue. In many ways, fora are outdated, in that the vast majority of discussion on topics raised on blogs themselves can be addressed with pingbacks and trackbacks. In this manner, RSS feeds deliver content, and comments in these feeds will link to related posts, effectively creating a node-based bulletin board.</p>
<p>A problem with fora is their unnecessary complexity: moderation requires staff, the signal-to-noise ratio is usually horrible, and they cannot be followed easily from mobile devices or without investing considerable browsing time. That&#8217;s not to say that fora don&#8217;t have a place on the web, though in most all cases, they can better be replaced with <a href="http://groups.google.com">Google Groups</a> or a blog network. In cases where a pre-established fora already addresses a theme, additional fora aren&#8217;t necessary, because it will only serve to decentralize useful information. For example, for WoW Hunter theorycrafting, we already have <a href="http://elitistjerks.com/">Elitist Jerks</a> and <a href="http://tkasomething.com/">TKASomething</a>, which means the new <a href="http://www.bigredkitty.net/forums/index.php">BigRedKitty Forums</a> [sic] are unnecessarily redundant. In fact, the only niche this latter forum fills is to collect known WoW Hunter bloggers in one place, but this could easily have been done on the aforementioned, existing fora as well. While the atmosphere at BigRedKitty&#8217;s (BRK&#8217;s) place may be less &#8220;hardcore&#8221;, adding a third theorycrafting blog into the mix will only increase the time necessary to find useful theorycrafting information.</p>
<p>To bloggers <a href="http://mirshwow.blogspot.com/" class="broken_link">Mirshalak</a> and <a href="http://huntermayhem.com/">Pelides</a>, don&#8217;t worry if your fora aren&#8217;t successful. You&#8217;re better off creating an account at an existing forum, because it will mean less work/responsibility, and an easier method to engross yourself in theorycrafting discussion. Vanity fora serve no real purpose other than to take up bandwidth and setup time. BRK&#8217;s forum has shown initial success, and it&#8217;s served to bring Hunter bloggers together, so let&#8217;s be content with that and move forward. In the meantime, know that we&#8217;re still subscribing to your RSS feeds, and that&#8217;s where the real content comes from anyway.<strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://mendax.org/2008/01/18/more-on-bloggers-fora/" rel="bookmark" title="January 18, 2008">More on blogger&#8217;s fora.</a> &#8211; When I brought up the trend of World of <a href="http://mendax.org/tag/warcraft/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with warcraft">Warcraft</a> (WoW) bloggers adding fora to their sites, I commen&#8230;</li>
<p></p>
<li><a href="http://mendax.org/2007/02/04/the-online-forum/" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2007">The online Forum.</a> &#8211; When <a href="http://mendax.org/tag/internet/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with internet">Internet</a> accessibility was widespread enough to drive Bulletin Board Systems underground, Usene&#8230;</li>
<p></p>
<li><a href="http://mendax.org/2008/09/25/unsurprising-blogger-population-slows/" rel="bookmark" title="September 25, 2008">Unsurprising: Blogger population slows.</a> &#8211;  Jacqui Cheng posted about the overall blogosphere population slowing its growth, while profit-for-b&#8230;</li>
<p></p>
<li><a href="http://mendax.org/2002/05/09/new-features-and-forum-phase-out/" rel="bookmark" title="May 9, 2002">New features, and forum phase-out.</a> &#8211; As mendax.org continues to grow thanks to the number of hits we&#8217;ve been getting lately, we intend on&#8230;</li>
<p></p>
<li><a href="http://mendax.org/2007/01/23/if-all-your-friends-jumped-off-a-bridge/" rel="bookmark" title="January 23, 2007">If all your friends jumped off a bridge&#8230;</a> &#8211; Over ten years ago, when mendax.org first went online, the term &#8220;blog&#8221; didn&#8217;t even exist. Back then,&#8230;</li>
<p>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 10.889 ms --></p>


<div class="shr-bookmarks shr-bookmarks-expand shr-bookmarks-center shr-bookmarks-bg-knowledge">
<ul class="socials">
		<li class="shr-twitter">
			<a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Hunter+blogs%3A+welcome+to+2004.+-+http://sl.ly/551bc&amp;source=shareaholic" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Tweet This!">Tweet This!</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-facebook">
			<a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?v=4&amp;src=bm&amp;u=http://mendax.org/2007/12/25/hunter-blogs-welcome-to-2004/&amp;t=Hunter+blogs%3A+welcome+to+2004." rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Facebook">Share this on Facebook</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-digg">
			<a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http://mendax.org/2007/12/25/hunter-blogs-welcome-to-2004/&amp;title=Hunter+blogs%3A+welcome+to+2004." rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Digg this!">Digg this!</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-reddit">
			<a href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://mendax.org/2007/12/25/hunter-blogs-welcome-to-2004/&amp;title=Hunter+blogs%3A+welcome+to+2004." rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Reddit">Share this on Reddit</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-stumbleupon">
			<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://mendax.org/2007/12/25/hunter-blogs-welcome-to-2004/&amp;title=Hunter+blogs%3A+welcome+to+2004." rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon">Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-googlebuzz">
			<a href="http://www.google.com/buzz/post?url=http://mendax.org/2007/12/25/hunter-blogs-welcome-to-2004/&amp;imageurl=" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Post on Google Buzz">Post on Google Buzz</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-technorati">
			<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?add=http://mendax.org/2007/12/25/hunter-blogs-welcome-to-2004/" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Technorati">Share this on Technorati</a>
		</li>
</ul>
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mendax.org/2007/12/25/hunter-blogs-welcome-to-2004/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Class breakdown for multiboxing.</title>
		<link>http://mendax.org/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Posts+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fmendax.org%2F2007%2F08%2F30%2Fclass-breakdown-for-multiboxing%2F&amp;seed_title=Class+breakdown+for+multiboxing.</link>
		<comments>http://mendax.org/2007/08/30/class-breakdown-for-multiboxing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WyldKard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Techno-Shaman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theorycraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warcraft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mendax.org/?p=574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My recent experience with multiboxing helped me organize my thoughts on which World of Warcraft (WoW) classes lend themselves towards the practice. In general, the &#8220;main&#8221; character (or master)can be anything, while secondary (or slave) characters are better off as ranged classes. This is because positioning becomes a concern when multiboxing, and though positioning issues [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>My recent <a href="http://mendax.org/?p=573">experience with multiboxing</a> helped me organize my thoughts on which World of <a href="http://mendax.org/tag/warcraft/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with warcraft">Warcraft</a> (WoW) classes lend themselves towards the practice. In general, the &#8220;main&#8221; character (or <i>master</i>)can be anything, while secondary (or <i>slave</i>) characters are better off as ranged classes. This is because positioning becomes a concern when multiboxing, and though positioning issues can be overcome, it&#8217;s easier to just bombard enemies from afar.</p>
<p>Arguably, the master character is well-suited to be a tanking class, because of the aggro lock. Let&#8217;s break things down spec-by-spec, however.</p>
<ul>
<li>Balance/Restoration Druid: Excellent slave choice, with the flexibility of a supporting damage class and a healer. At level 40, Moonkin form makes for a powerful supporting nuker, without the squishiness of a cloth class. Speccing heavier in Restoration makes for a reasonable healbot, but I&#8217;d sooner take a number of Moonkin slaves with me; combined with a restoration Shaman, a Moonkin slave army would be a potent and robust force to be reckoned with.</li>
<li>Feral Druid: A good choice for a master character, particularly when supported by a healer.</li>
<li>Hunters: A good choice for a master character, but a little complex for slave characters. Pets add additional complexity when factored in as slaves, particularly since they are tank stand-ins. Arguably, if one&#8217;s master character is a tanking class, then a Hunter can make for a good slave character, but with aggro and crowd control being stapes of the Hunter class, there are far better ranged classes to act as slaves.</li>
<li>Mage: A traditional slave class for multiboxing, Mages are excellent artillery classes if one&#8217;s main is a tank. Mages are rather squishy, however, so having a healer along would be useful. Bringing Mage slaves along generally implies that one intends to burn down enemies before the slaves get into melee range.</li>
<li>Holy Paladin: A great healbot when dual-boxing who can take a hit and not require much monitoring.</li>
<li>Protection Paladin: A great master character, especially if one has a healer slave along, since it will fuel mana regrowth and therefore fuel aggro-holding abilities. With an AoE grinding spec and a healer in tow, expect to be nigh unstoppable.</li>
<li>Retribution Paladin: If you must play this spec, play it as a master character.</li>
<li>Holy/Discipline Priest: A good slave class, but not as great as healing classes that can take more melee hits.</li>
<li>Shadow Priest: Pre-40, this spec is a little squishy for a slave character, but post-40, it&#8217;s almost as good as a Moonkin. As a master character, a Shadow Priest is a potent force with the added flexibility of healing one&#8217;s slaves.</li>
<li>Rogue: Like other melee classes, the Rogue makes for a good master character. Moreso than other melee classes, the ROgue would be extremely difficult to play effectively as a slave.</li>
<li>Elemental/Restoration Shaman: Like the Balance/Restoration Druid, a non-melee Shaman is a great slave class. An army of Shaman slaves would allow numerous buffing totems to be dropped simultaneously. For dual-boxing, a Restoration Shaman is a great healbot slave, who can take a decent number of hits and still add ranged damage into the mix.</li>
<li>Enhancement Shaman: A solid main character if a healing slave is in the mix.</li>
<li>Warlock: Another traditional multiboxing class, the Warlock lends itself more to master characters than slaves, and like the Mage, works best under the theory that enemies will be dead long before they get into melee range.</li>
<li>Warrior: A solid master character class.</li>
<p>With the above in mind, I believe that the ultimate dual-boxing combination would be a Protection Paladin paired with a Restoration Shaman slave. This would ensure very quick grinding, and overcome problems with the Paladin being susceptible to ranged magic attacks. </p>
<p>As far as three+ boxing goes, I&#8217;m tempted to go with a Balance/Restoration Shaman or Shadow Priest master character, because both have methods of returning mana to their group, as well as healing them. Combine this with Balance Druid slaves, and we have a very robust fighting force that can virtually ignore spending early money on Feral skills. Not to mention, once the group hits level 40, the sight of two+ Moonkin minions escorting one&#8217;s character is downright cool.</ul>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://mendax.org/2007/07/25/the-five-man-dream-team/" rel="bookmark" title="July 25, 2007">The five-man dream team.</a> &#8211; When I get a chance to play World of <a href="http://mendax.org/tag/warcraft/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with warcraft">Warcraft</a> (WoW) these days, I find that running an instance as a&#8230;</li>
<p></p>
<li><a href="http://mendax.org/2009/03/02/runemaster-to-be-the-next-wow-hero-class/" rel="bookmark" title="March 2, 2009">Runemaster to be the next WoW hero class?</a> &#8211;  We pretty much agree with Wolfshead&#8217;s suggestion that the next World of <a href="http://mendax.org/tag/warcraft/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with warcraft">Warcraft</a> (WoW) hero class w&#8230;</li>
<p></p>
<li><a href="http://mendax.org/2005/10/26/paganism-is-in-holy-warriors-are-out/" rel="bookmark" title="October 26, 2005">Paganism is in. Holy warriors are out.</a> &#8211; Despite the annexation of pagan holidays by Ye Ol&#8217; Catholic Church, there&#8217;s one thing the holy light&#8230;</li>
<p></p>
<li><a href="http://mendax.org/2007/08/29/my-first-experience-with-multiboxing/" rel="bookmark" title="August 29, 2007">My first experience with multiboxing.</a> &#8211; There&#8217;s a reason I linked to the Dual-Boxing forums yesterday, and that reason is a passing interest&#8230;</li>
<p></p>
<li><a href="http://mendax.org/2007/05/17/the-shaman-mini-guide/" rel="bookmark" title="May 17, 2007">The Shaman mini-guide.</a> &#8211; v 2.0 The spiritual holy-warrior for the Horde, the Shaman is a hybrid class akin to the Druid and P&#8230;</li>
<p>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 13.157 ms --></p>


<div class="shr-bookmarks shr-bookmarks-expand shr-bookmarks-center shr-bookmarks-bg-knowledge">
<ul class="socials">
		<li class="shr-twitter">
			<a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Class+breakdown+for+multiboxing.+-+http://sl.ly/48536&amp;source=shareaholic" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Tweet This!">Tweet This!</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-facebook">
			<a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?v=4&amp;src=bm&amp;u=http://mendax.org/2007/08/30/class-breakdown-for-multiboxing/&amp;t=Class+breakdown+for+multiboxing." rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Facebook">Share this on Facebook</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-digg">
			<a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http://mendax.org/2007/08/30/class-breakdown-for-multiboxing/&amp;title=Class+breakdown+for+multiboxing." rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Digg this!">Digg this!</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-reddit">
			<a href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://mendax.org/2007/08/30/class-breakdown-for-multiboxing/&amp;title=Class+breakdown+for+multiboxing." rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Reddit">Share this on Reddit</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-stumbleupon">
			<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://mendax.org/2007/08/30/class-breakdown-for-multiboxing/&amp;title=Class+breakdown+for+multiboxing." rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon">Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-googlebuzz">
			<a href="http://www.google.com/buzz/post?url=http://mendax.org/2007/08/30/class-breakdown-for-multiboxing/&amp;imageurl=" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Post on Google Buzz">Post on Google Buzz</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-technorati">
			<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?add=http://mendax.org/2007/08/30/class-breakdown-for-multiboxing/" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Technorati">Share this on Technorati</a>
		</li>
</ul>
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mendax.org/2007/08/30/class-breakdown-for-multiboxing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The five-man dream team.</title>
		<link>http://mendax.org/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Posts+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fmendax.org%2F2007%2F07%2F25%2Fthe-five-man-dream-team%2F&amp;seed_title=The+five-man+dream+team.</link>
		<comments>http://mendax.org/2007/07/25/the-five-man-dream-team/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WyldKard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Techno-Shaman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mmogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theorycraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warcraft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mendax.org/?p=559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I get a chance to play World of Warcraft (WoW) these days, I find that running an instance as a PUG (public group) is more difficult than it used to be. I blame this primarily on the fact that there are less low-level players than there used to be, since everyone is running Heroics [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>When I get a chance to play World of <a href="http://mendax.org/tag/warcraft/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with warcraft">Warcraft</a> (WoW) these days, I find that running an instance as a PUG (public group) is more difficult than it used to be. I blame this primarily on the fact that there are less low-level players than there used to be, since everyone is running Heroics lately; running <i>end-game</i> instances as a PUG seems much more common.</p>
<p>In any case, the lack of groups forming for low-level instances means finding the perfect class setup isn&#8217;t much of an option. Nonetheless, the <i>potential</i> for running a kickass group is there, and changes in WoW from the early days of my playing have drastically changed my outlook on what my five-man PvE dream-team is. For those not around during my previous musings about the subject, my traditional ideal five-man team was made up of a Protection Warrior, Holy Priest, Feral Druid, Mage, and Beastmastery Hunter. Things have since changed:</p>
<ol>
<li>Protection Paladin: Now capable of truly tanking, the Paladin class offers things that Warriors don&#8217;t, such as a quicker method for building aggro from the start of combat, to a ranged taunt that doesn&#8217;t require the tank to pursue enemies that are going after another team member. Since a Paladin&#8217;s abilities are fueled by mana, and since he gains mana whenever healed, and since tanks will be healed more than anyone else, a Paladin tank will not need to worry about not being able to use his abilities. In addition, a Protection Paladin&#8217;s ability to AoE grind means this team member will be able to tackle traditional AoE scenarios that were risky for cloth-wearing types. Paladin buffs are another bonus.</li>
<li>Restoration Shaman: As we already have a Paladin in the group, we&#8217;re down to three choices for healers, but we&#8217;re going with a Shaman because she offers the group a number of situation-specific buffs by way of her totems. Such luxuries include Mana Tide, which will be quite useful because the group we&#8217;re building will be mana-heavy. A Shaman will also offer the tank Earth Shield, and will allow the Paladin to get more use out of his seals with Windfury procs. With more healing options than a Holy Paladin, more buffs than a Priest, and more survivability than a Restoration Druid, the Shaman is a great fit, whose comparative mana inefficiency will not be a huge issue in this group.</li>
<li>Shadow Priest: The first of our DPS classes will be able to take damage better than other cloth wearers because of Shadow Form, and will offer the group additional healing and mana, which will help power the abilities of almost everyone in this team. The Priest will also offer the option of using Shackle against undead opponents, and he also has a method for reducing aggro if necessary.</li>
<li>Survival Hunter: While a Beastmastery Hunter could very well fit into this group, we&#8217;re instead going to go with additional crowd control (CC), allowing this group to tackle mobs with greater ease. Since the Hunter will be pulling in our instance runs, the option to Feign Death a second time should the first be resisted is a nice bonus. Effectively, the Hunter in this team will be a CC master, whose sustained DPS will in great part be maintained by abilities offered by the Shaman and Priest.</li>
<li>Feral Druid: For our spec, we&#8217;ll go with a DPS-oriented build. As the only non-mana-using DPS class in the group, the Druid will nonetheless keep a mana pool handy in case he needs to heal. Since he can drop an Innervate when needed, he offers the Shaman more sustained healing, and if it&#8217;s not necessary, the Innervate can go to any of the other mana-using classes depending on the current needs of the group. The Druid will offer yet another &#8220;oh shit&#8221; recovery factor, and like the other DPS classes in this group, can reduce aggro when necessary.</li>
</ol>
<p>This five-man team offers significant survivability and sustained damage and healing. What I love about the setup is that it uses a non-traditional tank, a non-traditional healer, and two off-spec builds. With mana being returned to the group by two of its members (and a possible a third by way of Innervate), fueling abilities should be a non-factor. Also, controlling aggro is easy in this group, since all of the DPS classes can reduce their own aggro, and both the Paladin and Shaman have buffs to further reduce aggro for those who need it.</p>
<p>Sadly, I won&#8217;t get a chance to try out this five-man team for some time, but if I were re-rolling with friends, I&#8217;d definitely propose this setup.<strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://mendax.org/2007/08/30/class-breakdown-for-multiboxing/" rel="bookmark" title="August 30, 2007">Class breakdown for multiboxing.</a> &#8211; My recent experience with multiboxing helped me organize my thoughts on which World of <a href="http://mendax.org/tag/warcraft/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with warcraft">Warcraft</a> (WoW&#8230;</li>
<p></p>
<li><a href="http://mendax.org/2005/10/26/paganism-is-in-holy-warriors-are-out/" rel="bookmark" title="October 26, 2005">Paganism is in. Holy warriors are out.</a> &#8211; Despite the annexation of pagan holidays by Ye Ol&#8217; Catholic Church, there&#8217;s one thing the holy light&#8230;</li>
<p></p>
<li><a href="http://mendax.org/2005/11/25/warrior-pope-to-take-roids/" rel="bookmark" title="November 25, 2005">Warrior Pope to take &#8216;roids.</a> &#8211; It wasn&#8217;t long ago that I brought up the loveable Paladin, a character class in the World of Warcraf&#8230;</li>
<p></p>
<li><a href="http://mendax.org/2006/06/04/the-role-of-the-faithful-warrior/" rel="bookmark" title="June 4, 2006">The role of the faithful warrior.</a> &#8211; Perhaps because I&#8217;ve been involved in game design in the past, or perhaps simply because I play a Sh&#8230;</li>
<p></p>
<li><a href="http://mendax.org/2007/05/17/look-ma-i-found-a-n3wb/" rel="bookmark" title="May 17, 2007">Look ma, I found a n3wb!</a> &#8211; It&#8217;s a Wednesday afternoon and a bunch of humanoid pigs need killin&#8217;. Again. In WoW-speak, this mean&#8230;</li>
<p>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 14.168 ms --></p>


<div class="shr-bookmarks shr-bookmarks-expand shr-bookmarks-center shr-bookmarks-bg-knowledge">
<ul class="socials">
		<li class="shr-twitter">
			<a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=The+five-man+dream+team.+-+http://sl.ly/07e6d&amp;source=shareaholic" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Tweet This!">Tweet This!</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-facebook">
			<a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?v=4&amp;src=bm&amp;u=http://mendax.org/2007/07/25/the-five-man-dream-team/&amp;t=The+five-man+dream+team." rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Facebook">Share this on Facebook</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-digg">
			<a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http://mendax.org/2007/07/25/the-five-man-dream-team/&amp;title=The+five-man+dream+team." rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Digg this!">Digg this!</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-reddit">
			<a href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://mendax.org/2007/07/25/the-five-man-dream-team/&amp;title=The+five-man+dream+team." rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Reddit">Share this on Reddit</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-stumbleupon">
			<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://mendax.org/2007/07/25/the-five-man-dream-team/&amp;title=The+five-man+dream+team." rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon">Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-googlebuzz">
			<a href="http://www.google.com/buzz/post?url=http://mendax.org/2007/07/25/the-five-man-dream-team/&amp;imageurl=" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Post on Google Buzz">Post on Google Buzz</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-technorati">
			<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?add=http://mendax.org/2007/07/25/the-five-man-dream-team/" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Technorati">Share this on Technorati</a>
		</li>
</ul>
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mendax.org/2007/07/25/the-five-man-dream-team/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Class Roles: Instances</title>
		<link>http://mendax.org/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Posts+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fmendax.org%2F2005%2F12%2F27%2Fclass-roles-instances%2F&amp;seed_title=Class+Roles%3A+Instances</link>
		<comments>http://mendax.org/2005/12/27/class-roles-instances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WyldKard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Techno-Shaman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theorycraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warcraft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mendax.org/?page_id=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[v1.5 What a lot of people don&#8217;t understand when they begin playing a game like World of Warcraft (WoW) is that their choice of class is very important when it comes to the type of role the character is expected to play in a group. Understandably, the reasons that lead a player to roll a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><em>v1.5</em></p>
<p>What a lot of people don&#8217;t understand when they begin playing a game like World of <a href="http://mendax.org/tag/warcraft/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with warcraft">Warcraft</a> (WoW) is that their choice of class is very important when it comes to the type of role the character is expected to play in a group. Understandably, the reasons that lead a player to roll a particular class do not always align with how the class best benefits a group. This is especially true when the character is in a small guild, where organizing a group to complete an instance requires certain roles in the group to be played very well. After Blizzard lowered the player cap in the non-raid end-game instances from 10 to five, assembling the right classes, played the most effective way possible, is more important than ever. Unfortunately, a lot of players don&#8217;t really understand what roles their classes are expected to play, and their groups tend to suffer because of this.</p>
<p>This guide is not meant to be a highly-detailed look into every class, nor will it discuss the details of different talent builds for WoW classes. Rather, this guide is meant to explain group dynamics specifically as it applies to five and ten-man instances, though much of what follows is also applicable to larger groups in both PvE and PvP environments, and can be adjusted accordingly. For the roles listed, classes are often named with a talent-tree focus; while it is not necessary for certain trees to be focused on for earlier instances, players are urged to invest in the noted trees when they are ready for serious instances.</p>
<p><strong>Mandatory Role 1: Main Tank<br />
</strong><br />
Capable classes: Druid (Feral), Paladin (Protection), Warrior (Protection)</p>
<p>The Main Tank (MT) is the front-runner of any group, whose job it is to always be in the middle of the fray, getting hit by enemies so that the enemies don&#8217;t go off and hit the MT&#8217;s allies. Contrary to the beliefs of many would-be MTs, however, the MT is not able to do his job by wearing heavy armor alone. Rather, the MT can only do his job by keeping the attention of enemy mobs on himself (&#8220;holding aggro&#8221;), which is only possible by doing significant damage, or taunting enemies. This is an immensely important point, because where most would-be MTs fail is in their inability to properly hold aggro; the term &#8220;tank&#8221; is not synonymous with &#8220;damage soaker&#8221;, as this is only part of what a tank does.</p>
<p>There are only three classes in WoW capable of being a MT: the Druid, the Paladin, and the Warrior. No other class has the ability to draw aggro at will, nor mitigate the damage they receive once they have it. Other classes must rely on burst damage to draw aggro, and because of their armor, cannot take a sustained beating from more than one mob at a time.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, many Warriors decide not to spend talent points in the right places, which could have a drastic effect as to how well they can play the role of MT. For example, many Warriors decide to focus heavily on the Fury talent tree, which may give the Warrior excellent damage-per-second (DPS), but will do little in the way of helping the Warrior tank. As noted, damage is only one of three factors that make up a MT. While the Fury tree may be excellent for Warriors who primarily engage in PvP battles, it is a poor build for instances, and very often, Warriors who are used to dealing damage through their Battle and Berserker stances fail to be effective in a group setting, where the Defensive stance, along with a one-hander and shield, is preferred.</p>
<p>The Warrior&#8217;s Protection tree is ideal for a MT, as exemplified by such talents as Defiance (a blanket threat increase on all attacks made by the Warrior), and Improved Taunt (letting the Warrior use his Taunt ability more often). In addition, the Protection tree allows a Warrior to get more and better use out of his shield. While it is tempting for many Warriors not to use a shield so as to do more damage, it should be noted that it is not the MT&#8217;s job to deal out mass damage, but rather to dish out only enough damage to compliment his taunts, such that all aggro is on himself; without exception, any Warrior who intends to be the MT should use a shield, as a shield-less warrior simply does not have the armor potential to MT properly. Even with epic-level armor, a shield-less Warrior will require more heals, and become a greater liability to the group as a result.</p>
<p>The Warrior&#8217;s Arms tree is also quite useful, and allows the Warrior to increase his ability to parry (for surviving longer), and to hold Rage between stances (with Tactical Mastery). This is quite useful, since fights may begin with the Warrior charging in and using Sweeping Strikes to attack nearby opponents, which gathers aggro from numerous enemies at once. With abilities in the non-defensive stances, the Warrior can initially hold aggro with high-damage attacks, but should enemies begin to ignore the Warrior in favor of his allies, Tactical Mastery allows the Warrior to switch to the defensive stance and taunt enemies accordingly, and still have Rage left to power abilities in the defensive stance. This flexibility allows the Warrior to properly damage, taunt, and soak damage, which are the three requisites of a Warrior MT.</p>
<p>Unique to the Warrior are an array of abilities that have a high threat associated with them, such as Sunder and Revenge. A proper combination of these types of abilities will ensure that anyone the Warrior engages remains focused on the Warrior. Usually, however, the Warrior needs a few seconds to apply these abilities before his allies can charge in to assist without fear of drawing aggro themselves.</p>
<p>The Druid&#8217;s bear form not only matches the armor of a plate-wearing class, but the Druid can also taunt in bear form. While the Druid doesn&#8217;t have abilities like Sunder that he can apply to his foes, the Druid holds aggro in part by the damage he does, which is generally higher than that of a shield-toting Protection-specced Warrior. With the Druid&#8217;s Swipe ability, he may draw aggro from numerous enemies (akin to a Warrior&#8217;s Sweeping Strikes), and can immediately taunt enemies without the need to switch stances. Talents such as Feral Instinct in the Feral tree increase a Druid&#8217;s threat using attacks in bear form, and talents such as Heart of the Wild are blanket stamina increases to keep the Druid alive longer. While the Druid does not have as many abilities to pick and choose from as the Warrior does when tanking is concerned, the Druid can nonetheless utilize an area-of-effect (AoE) debuff, as well as Faerie Fire, to keep his threat up. What a Druid lacks in shield use, he makes up for in (generally) a higher base armor and health pool.</p>
<p>As of the Burning Crusade, the Paladin finally became a class capable of tanking. A shield-toting Paladin holds aggro thanks to an AoE attack and other holy damage. Unlike the Druid and Warrior, the Paladin&#8217;s taunt is unique, in that instead of directing it on a mob, the Paladin directs it on an ally, pulling mobs off of them. This makes the Paladin able to sit stationary much of the time without pursuing mobs as they run after the party&#8217;s casters. While the Druid is able to heal intermittently thanks to an ability that converts rage to health, the Paladin can generate health as he hits enemies, thanks to his Seal/Judgmenet of Light spell.</p>
<p>Unless there is no Hunter in the group, the MT should always pull mobs, as it immediately directs aggro in their direction. A Warrior can use a ranged weapon to accomplish this, while a Druid can use any of his caster abilities, but should use something hard-hitting, such as a Starfire followed by a Moonfire. If the instance is not indoors, a Druid MT can also use Entangling Roots for crowd-control, taking one enemy out of the fray temporarily. Paladins cannot pull from significant range unless the enemy is a caster and the Paladin is a Blood Elf, though trinkets and dynamite can overcome this limitation if the Paladin does not spec for a ranged attack.</p>
<p>Once enemies are close, the MT should use a multi-enemy attack or AoE, cementing aggro on enemies that were not the MT&#8217;s main target. At this point, the MT should attack as fervently as possible, using available stuns to decrease the number of enemies attacking at any given time, and using taunts to keep running enemies on them. By cycling through enemies that are already on the MT, and using high-threat abilities accordingly, the group gains an assurance that there will always be enough enemies around the MT that multi-enemy attacks get their maximum effect. Only when the MT is taking so much damage that heals aren&#8217;t keeping up should the MT back off on using his highest-threat attacks.</p>
<p>In regards to taunts, there is a very important thing to remember: taunts do not have any effect on enemies that are already focused on the tank. Imagine that aggro is a numerical value that can be increased by pure damage or by certain abilities that have a high threat associated with them. When a tank loses aggro, a taunt makes the tank&#8217;s threat equal to the threat of the individual who pulled aggro off the tank. Therefore, if the tank is unable to increase his threat immediately after the taunt, the taunt will be ineffective. This is why a taunt should ideally always be followed by a high-threat attack.</p>
<p>If there are multiple tanks in a group, it is a waste of rage/mana to draw aggro from one another. Assign one the role of MT who will gain the brunt of NPC attention, but don&#8217;t worry if another tank inadvertently pulls aggro. If the MT starts taking too much damage for the healer(s) to keep up, the second tank can assume the MT role and pull aggro accordingly, giving the previous MT time to recover.</p>
<p><strong>Mandatory Role 2: Main Healer<br />
</strong><br />
Capable classes: Druid (Restoration), Paladin (Holy), Priest (Holy), Shaman (Restoration)</p>
<p>Every group, in order to survive, needs a character able to heal her allies. It is the job of the Main Healer (MH) to use whatever healing abilities are available for maximum effect. While there are four healing-capable classes, their roles vary for larger groups, and each have distinct advantages.</p>
<p>The Druid and Priest were the original MHs. The two significant differences between them is in how their respective healing abilities work. The Priest has the ability to heal almost instantly (Flash Heal), while the Druid does not. As a result, the Druid generally needs to wait until his ally&#8217;s health is much lower before applying a heal. However, the Druid&#8217;s advantage in combat is that her heals have healing-over-time (HoT) effects much better than those of the Priest. Because of this, the Druid is recognized as a &#8220;maintenance healer&#8221;, and is generally better at healing multiple targets.</p>
<p>The Paladin and Shaman are both good at &#8220;spot-healing,&#8221; in which they choose one target only (the MT), and keep that target&#8217;s health up. These classes have fewer healing spells than the Druid and Priest, and are generally not as adept at being MH without another class assisting. Nonetheless, they are notable in their healing capacity because despite smaller mana pools, they are able to outlast aggro gained from healing thanks to better damage mitigation than Druids and Priests.</p>
<p>Regardless of what class once chooses to serve as the MH, a focus on the appropriate tree is mandatory for anything end-game. Prior to this, Priests are able to be a MH regardless of build, so long as they have appropriate gear, which should be high in Spirit and +healing.</p>
<p>It is the primary job of the MH to focus efforts on keeping the MT alive. If the MT is doing his job, he is minimizing who else in the party is getting attacked. As such, the MH has the luxury of healing one person rather than five, and can best do this by using healing abilities that do not over-heal. (Over-healing is when a heal brings the target to 100% health, and could have done so even if the target&#8217;s health were lower when the heal was applied. This is mana inefficient, as more mana was used for the heal than was necessary, since the maximum effect of the heal could not be realized.) Over-healing can be prevented by using lower levels of a particular healing spell, or a different healing spell when available. This is why the Priest is regarded as the most versatile healer class, since they have healing spells of various strength and casting time.</p>
<p>For a Priest, the Flash Heal spell is ideal to apply to the MT, while Renew is ideal for a Druid. Keeping a HoT spell active on the MT at all times while the MT is taking damage is also preferable.</p>
<p>Many inexperienced Priests believe that Power Word: Shield (PW:S) is useful when applied to an ally, but in most cases such is false. Since PW:S prevents damage to a tank, the tank is unable to generate as much rage from his opponent&#8217;s attacks, thus decreasing his effectiveness. Furthermore, when surrounded by enemies, the mana used on PW:S is too high for the benefit PW:S provides, and the priest could have better used her mana on an actual heal. Furthermore, the aggro directed at the Priest for casting PW:S is another reason that it should be avoided. Generally, PW:S should only be used when the target&#8217;s health is too low to get a proper heal off.</p>
<p>If things go bad, and the MH is being attacked, there are a couple things that can be done. Firstly, if the MH is a Priest, she should cast Fade in an effort to remove aggro such that someone else can pick it up. Should that not work, the Priest can use PW:S to survive long enough for someone else to gain aggro back, else cast Fear as a last resort to keep the enemy at bay. Under no circumstances should the MH attack, however, since this will do nothing but make it more difficult to draw aggro off the Priest; even if being attacked, the Priest is a much greater aid to the party by continuing to heal the MT, and should not defend herself by casting offensive spells, or using her weapon or wand, unless the attacking mob is soon to die anyway.</p>
<p>If the MH is a Druid, by nature of her armor class, she will survive direct attacks longer. A Druid can also switch into cat form and use the Cower ability to remove aggro. In most cases, like the Priests&#8217;s Fade, this will be enough to get the enemy away. It is worth repeating that the MH should never attack an enemy, as the MH&#8217;s damage is negligible compared to the aggro it will produce and the harm it will therefore bring upon the party. Druids can also cast Barkskin or Tree of Life where appropriate, in an effort to mitigate more damage.</p>
<p>Paladin and Shaman healers should always use a shield. While neither class has an active method for reducing aggro, both have more armor than a Druid healer. While Paladins are stuck taking damage, Shamans, who have less armor, have other methods to survive until the aggravated mob is pulled off; Shamans have a totem that can taunt, as well as one that slows enemy advances.</p>
<p>While the general rule of thumb is that a MH should not engage offensively, there are some exceptions. If a few more hits are enough to bring the last enemy down, the MH may as well use offensive spells if he does not expect any more healing to be necessary. Similarly, in an engagement where the experienced MH does not expect to pour his entire mana pool into heals, the MH can use lower-threat attacks to help the group out. Fortunately, since patch 1.10 and the Priest revamp, an offensive non-shadow spec is possible, giving the Priest the option of using Holy spells to help his group do damage without the threat-generation that shadow spells natively provide.</p>
<p>While it is the MH&#8217;s job to keep the party alive, all efforts should be put into keeping the MT healthy, even if this means losing someone else in the party. The MT is the glue that keeps enemy aggro focused, and if he falls, the MH will likely be next.</p>
<p>Since the MH needs to conserve mana as much as possible, there are some classes that the MH should spend less time healing, since they should be able to take care of themselves. In reality, in addition to the MT, the only person a MH should have to heal on a routine basis is the Off-Tank.</p>
<p><strong>Suggested Role 1: The Off-Tank<br />
</strong><br />
Capable classes: Druid, Hunter, Paladin, Rogue, Shaman, Warlock, Warrior</p>
<p>Any character capable of being the MT can serve as an Off-Tank (OT), since the OT benefits from the same three factors as a MT: armor, damage, and taunts. However, the OT does not necessarily require the ability to taunt, making OTs free to invest in whichever talent tree they choose.</p>
<p>It is the OT&#8217;s role to keep enemies off the MH. Even a good MT can lose enemies to the aggro generated by a MH&#8217;s healing spells. While the MT is busy fighting numerous enemies at a time, sometimes other enemies will aggro and won&#8217;t be within the MT&#8217;s striking range. For example, a Druid&#8217;s Swipe ability will strike up to three enemies, but a fourth enemy won&#8217;t be struck, and unless taunted, will be happy to attack the MH instead of the MT. In this example, it is the OT&#8217;s job to make sure that the fourth enemy stays occupied.</p>
<p>Since the OT will rarely need to fight more than one or two enemies at a time, the OT doesn&#8217;t need quite the damage mitigation a MT does, though it never hurts. However, the OT can forego some armor if it means significantly greater DPS, which allows the OT to steal aggro away from the MT should the MT be having too tough a time. In the case of Paladins and Shamans, this means that they can lose the shield and use a two-hander or dual wield instead of using a shield. In lieu of taunts, these two classes can bring benefits to a group and still grapple aggro from the MH, or from a MT who&#8217;s bitten off more than he can chew. While the Paladin has the armor and threat-production abilities to be a good OT, the Shaman can draw aggro with his enormous spell-based DPS, which can then quickly put an enemy down. Earth Shock, for example, is heavy in burst damage and raw threat generation, and should be used specifically for OT purposes.</p>
<p>While the OT who is a Druid, Paladin, or Shaman can usually heal himself, since the OT can help minimize damage taken by the MT, and may have to attack numerous enemies should the MH get mobbed by same, the OT should feel comfortable using his mana offensively, so long as he realizes that he should always keep enough handy should it be needed for a last-minute heal. That said, there is no excuse for an OT dying with a filled mana pool; an OT should only expect heals from the MH if he is actually making use of his mana pool, or in the case of a Druid, does not have the opportunity to switch forms.</p>
<p>Two classes with interesting abilities that allow them to potentially OT well, are the Hunter and Warlock, who each have pets capable of drawing aggro by way of taunts. Unlike other OT-capable classes, the Hunter and Warlock require much greater management of battlefield resources, though the benefits are great:  Hunters can heal their pets when health gets low, and can reduce aggro with pet abilities like Cower or with native abilities such as Distracting Shot. Warlocks can siphon health from enemies firmly stuck to the MT, while siphoning that health back to their pet. In the case of both these classes, they should rarely, if ever, require healing from an ally, since they can easily use bandages while their respective pets fight. Additionally, a Hunter OT, should he gain aggro himself, can Feign Death to drop it immediately, allowing his pet to regain a mob&#8217;s attention.</p>
<p>The Rogue is an interesting addition to this list, because his ability to OT is tied mainly to his Evasion ability, which drastically increases the Rogue dodge chance. When available, this ability allows the Rogue to mitigate damage very well for a short period of time, but thereafter, the Rogue will have to resort to dropping aggro again, or stunlocking his target. The latter allows the Rogue to keep one enemy out of play so long as no one else is attacking it, making the Rogue&#8217;s ability to OT rely significantly on group dynamics and cooldowns. Additionally, certain talents need to be purchased to prolong the times of a Rogue&#8217;s stuns. As such, while capable of the OT role, the Rogue does not generally play it as well as other classes.</p>
<p><strong>Suggested Role 2: The Off-Healer<br />
</strong><br />
Capable classes: Druid, Paladin, Priest, Shaman</p>
<p>The Off-Healer (OH) is not a dedicated healer, and is more of a combat-healer than anything else. In cases where the group simply gets mobbed unexpectedly, or a boss battle is going on too long, the MH may simply not have the mana pool to keep up with the damage the MT and the OT are taking. Enter the OH, who should be able to fight in some capacity, and yet still heal a group.</p>
<p>Excellent OHs are Druids, who can play supporting combat roles in bear or cat forms while conserving their mana pools. If the MH&#8217;s mana pool goes dry, a Druid can simply switch to caster form, and use her unused mana pool to let the MH regenerate mana. Other classes that do well in this role are the Paladin and Shaman, who, when not playing the OT, can conserve their mana by not using mana intensive attacks, such that they have enough in reserve to cover healing issues. Interestingly, all Paladins, and non-Elemental Shamans, can serve dual roles as the OT and OH for a group, so long as they conserve their mana appropriately. Similarly, while Shadow Priests need to watch their mana pools, if needed, they can leave Shadow Form and heal appropriately.</p>
<p>The OH, while serving as backup for the MH, should also watch other group members. Since it is the MH&#8217;s primary responsibility to heal the MT, the OH should primarily watch everyone else in the group, and make sure their healing needs are covered while the MH is busy.</p>
<p><strong>Suggested Role 3: The Damage Dealer<br />
</strong><br />
Capable classes: Druid (Balance/Feral), Hunter, Mage, Priest (Shadow), Rogue, Shaman (Elemental/Enhancement), Warlock, Warrior (Arms/Fury)</p>
<p>While survivability is needed in a group, being able to kill mobs quickly tends to minimize damage taken to the group. Enter the Damage Dealer (DD), whose responsibility is to do nothing short of issuing strong attacks. Numerous classes are capable of playing this role, though certain talent-trees are better-suited than others, and being able to deal damage can also be very dependent on what gear a character is carrying. It is important to realize that the DD should be able to hit hard, but not draw too much aggro. If the DD does draw aggro, they should be able to lose it quickly, and ideally, heal themselves.</p>
<p>A Druid properly specced with Feral talents, who attacks in cat form, is an excellent damage-dealer. Since the Druid can Cower to lose aggro, the Druid has the ability to back off from a fight and heal himself. Since patch 1.08, Blizzard has begun putting more Feral-specific gear in the game, allowing decently-equipped Druids to compete on the DPS meters with the traditional DPS classes. Balance Druids are also able to deal enormous amounts of burst damage, and in Moonkin form, have the damage mitigation necessary to soak melee attacks if aggro is pulled unexpectedly.</p>
<p>Hunters are very viable damage dealers, with the bonus of having a high survivability thanks to their attacks being ranged. Since they do not need to use their pets to hold aggro in most situations, removing Growl from the pet auto-cast state and targeting the MT&#8217;s or OT&#8217;s target effectively gives Hunters free DPS without worry of having their pet get killed. When Growl is properly used to take attention of an add, a Hunter can deal damage to two enemies at once, and has abilities like Multi-Shot and Volley to attack additional targets when necessary. With Feign Death, the Hunter can maintain high damage and still keep from pulling aggro.</p>
<p>Shadow Priests are able to deal substantial damage and heal their group with shadow damage dealt. At later levels, they can also return mana to their group by dealing shadow damage, making them ideal group members when casters are in play.</p>
<p>The Mage is the highest multi-target DPS-class in the game thanks to his superior AoEs. A ranged class like the Hunter, the Mage is capable of dealing tremendous DPS when using fire-based attacks. However, the Mage&#8217;s enormous DPS tends to pull aggro very quickly, so to counter this, the Mage needs to use snares to keep enemies off himself, slow down the rate of casting to slow down aggro generation, or rely heavily on the OT to keep himself alive. That said, in cases where the Mage has been damaged, it is his job, when not engaged in combat, to bandage himself accordingly, conserving the mana of the group&#8217;s healers. Given the speed at which the Mage can take enemies down, he has ample time between kills to apply a first aid bandage before again attacking. With high spirit, the Mage can usually generate mana during this bandaging. Also, a Mage&#8217;s crowd control is very effective, as he can turn any living humanoid enemy into a sheep to make the battle easier on the group, or give him enough time to use a bandage. In all multi-enemy humanoid confrontations, the Mage should always have at least one enemy turned into a sheep.</p>
<p>The Rogue is arguably the highest single-target DPS-class in the game when played correctly. His use of poisons, fast weapons, and properly using Vanish and Preparation to add an extra Ambush attack are priceless. When a Rogue has drawn too much attention from an enemy, they can Feign to lose aggro, and have abilities like stuns and Blind to give them time to use bandages. A well-played Rogue should also rarely require heals. Additionally, a Rogue&#8217;s Sap ability allows the Rogue to take any humanoid target out of combat, akin to a Mage&#8217;s Sheep spell, albeit limited to the beginning of combat.</p>
<p>Shamans are highly-offensive, and spending points in Elemental and Enhancement merely solidify this. With Windfury on a slow two-handed weapon, Shamans can supplement their already frightening attacks with high-level shocks, which are instant attacks. With the ability to heal, Shamans can try to conserve some mana to keep an extra heal handy to help out the MH.</p>
<p>A Warlock who has invested in the Destruction tree has highly-potent attacks which, albeit not incredibly mana-efficient, deal enormous amounts of damage. Add to this the Warlock&#8217;s ability to place damage-over-time (DoT) spells on numerous enemies at once, and the Warlock becomes an intimidating adversary. Affliction Warlocks, lacking burst damage, still deal enormous damage over time, and can do so to multiple targets.</p>
<p>While all Warriors can do damage well, Arms and Fury Warriors emphasize damage, foregoing some ability to draw aggro away from his allies in an effort to simply kill faster. In this, the Warrior does excellent work, and in a tight situation, can change stances to taunt if necessary.<strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://mendax.org/2007/07/25/the-five-man-dream-team/" rel="bookmark" title="July 25, 2007">The five-man dream team.</a> &#8211; When I get a chance to play World of <a href="http://mendax.org/tag/warcraft/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with warcraft">Warcraft</a> (WoW) these days, I find that running an instance as a&#8230;</li>
<p></p>
<li><a href="http://mendax.org/2007/05/17/the-shaman-mini-guide/" rel="bookmark" title="May 17, 2007">The Shaman mini-guide.</a> &#8211; v 2.0 The spiritual holy-warrior for the Horde, the Shaman is a hybrid class akin to the Druid and P&#8230;</li>
<p></p>
<li><a href="http://mendax.org/2007/08/30/class-breakdown-for-multiboxing/" rel="bookmark" title="August 30, 2007">Class breakdown for multiboxing.</a> &#8211; My recent experience with multiboxing helped me organize my thoughts on which World of <a href="http://mendax.org/tag/warcraft/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with warcraft">Warcraft</a> (WoW&#8230;</li>
<p></p>
<li><a href="http://mendax.org/2006/06/04/the-role-of-the-faithful-warrior/" rel="bookmark" title="June 4, 2006">The role of the faithful warrior.</a> &#8211; Perhaps because I&#8217;ve been involved in game design in the past, or perhaps simply because I play a Sh&#8230;</li>
<p></p>
<li><a href="http://mendax.org/2007/05/17/the-druid-mini-guide/" rel="bookmark" title="May 17, 2007">The Druid mini-guide.</a> &#8211; v 2.0 The Druid, since his inception, has been referred to as a &#8220;Jack of all trades, master of none&#8230;.</li>
<p>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 22.603 ms --></p>


<div class="shr-bookmarks shr-bookmarks-expand shr-bookmarks-center shr-bookmarks-bg-knowledge">
<ul class="socials">
		<li class="shr-twitter">
			<a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Class+Roles%3A+Instances+-+http://sl.ly/12426&amp;source=shareaholic" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Tweet This!">Tweet This!</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-facebook">
			<a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?v=4&amp;src=bm&amp;u=http://mendax.org/2005/12/27/class-roles-instances/&amp;t=Class+Roles%3A+Instances" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Facebook">Share this on Facebook</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-digg">
			<a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http://mendax.org/2005/12/27/class-roles-instances/&amp;title=Class+Roles%3A+Instances" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Digg this!">Digg this!</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-reddit">
			<a href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://mendax.org/2005/12/27/class-roles-instances/&amp;title=Class+Roles%3A+Instances" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Reddit">Share this on Reddit</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-stumbleupon">
			<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://mendax.org/2005/12/27/class-roles-instances/&amp;title=Class+Roles%3A+Instances" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon">Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-googlebuzz">
			<a href="http://www.google.com/buzz/post?url=http://mendax.org/2005/12/27/class-roles-instances/&amp;imageurl=" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Post on Google Buzz">Post on Google Buzz</a>
		</li>
		<li class="shr-technorati">
			<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?add=http://mendax.org/2005/12/27/class-roles-instances/" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Technorati">Share this on Technorati</a>
		</li>
</ul>
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mendax.org/2005/12/27/class-roles-instances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
